Kenne v. Stennis, No. B242262 (D2d5 Oct. 21, 2014)
Unsurprisingly, a complaint based on making false police reports and filing meritless civil harassment petitions arises from protected activity, for anti-SLAPP purposes. Similarly unsurprising is that the plaintiff could not show a probability of success because her claims were barred by the litigation privilege in Civil Code § 47(b), as well as other policy-based privileges.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Just the Facts, Appellant
People v. Ashford University , No. D080671 (D4d1 Mar. 8, 2024). This is a UCL/FAL case that the Cal. AG brought against an online university...
-
Pollock v. Superior Court , No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023) Back in 2019, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 to inc...
-
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsi , No. A143781 (D1d3 Sept. 29, 2017) In this real estate warranty case, the court affirms a summary judgment in ...
No comments:
Post a Comment